Review week. The pen worked: seven documents returned 9-22, thirteen decision records, sweep green, device drained from 353 to about 100, seven new packages. Submissions still read one since 8-31, and the three Submit tasks from the 9-20 paper passed their 9-24 date unmarked.
The system now produces, decides and cleans up on its own. The one step only you can press has not moved in four weeks, and two packages with real clocks (Narrative Initiative, 9-24) expired or (Coursera, 9-30) are about to. This is the week to say plainly which it is: not yet, or not these.
Stage counts on 10-05 morning: 14 drafted, 28 packaged, 1 sent, 10 closed. Forty-two finished packages. The decision step caught up on 9-17 and 9-22; the produce step runs nightly; the send step is a human action with no system behind it, which the 9-23 audit (batch 1) proposes to fix with a SENT checkbox on each package paper.
Three kinds of package sit in the 42. Ones with a clock (Coursera 9-30, Groundwork 10-06, Twilio 10-31, Siemens 11-27). Ones that need your own words before they can go (GiveDirectly's two essays, PolicyLink and New America's no-AI letters, Democracy Alliance's conviction paragraph, Huge's two award sentences). And ones that are simply waiting. Each kind wants a different sentence from you: a date, a writing block, or a close.
Last week's D3 asked for three names and got three stars: Change.org, Groundwork, RCVRC, tasks dated 9-24. This week's D3 asks what to do with those tasks now the date has passed. Whatever you mark is fine; a blank is the one answer that keeps the same question coming back.
Count the stages yourself, then list the open Submit tasks.
awk -F'|' 'NR>3 && NF>5 {print $5}' /Users/tom/Claude/JobHunt/tracker.md \
| grep -oE '\*\*[a-z-]+\*\*' | sort | uniq -c
grep -n 'Submit' /tmp/pdb-weekly-review/things.json | head
Forty-two finished packages and one send is a human bottleneck, and the honest answers are a date or a close.